Shoffner & Associates
Hot Topics in the Law and in the News.
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Energy Credit Advantages
Expanded Recovery Act Tax Credits Help Homeowners Winterize their Homes, Save Energy; Check Tax Credit Certification Before You Buy, IRS Advises
Home Energy Video: English | Spanish | ASL
Audio File for Podcast: English | Spanish
Video: Money in Your Pocket
IR-2009-98, Oct. 29, 2009
WASHINGTON — People can now weatherize their homes and be rewarded for their efforts. According to the Internal Revenue Service, homeowners making energy-saving improvements this fall can cut their winter heating bills and lower their 2009 tax bill as well.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act), enacted earlier this year, expanded two home energy tax credits: the nonbusiness energy property credit and the residential energy efficient property credit.
Nonbusiness Energy Property Credit
This credit equals 30 percent of what a homeowner spends on eligible energy-saving improvements, up to a maximum tax credit of $1,500 for the combined 2009 and 2010 tax years. The cost of certain high-efficiency heating and air conditioning systems, water heaters and stoves that burn biomass all qualify, along with labor costs for installing these items. In addition, the cost of energy-efficient windows and skylights, energy-efficient doors, qualifying insulation and certain roofs also qualify for the credit, though the cost of installing these items does not count.
By spending as little as $5,000 before the end of the year on eligible energy-saving improvements, a homeowner can save as much as $1,500 on his or her 2009 federal income tax return. Due to limits based on tax liability, other credits claimed by a particular taxpayer and other factors, actual tax savings will vary. These tax savings are on top of any energy savings that may result.
Residential Energy Efficient Property Credit
Homeowners going green should also check out a second tax credit designed to spur investment in alternative energy equipment. The residential energy efficient property credit, equals 30 percent of what a homeowner spends on qualifying property such as solar electric systems, solar hot water heaters, geothermal heat pumps, wind turbines, and fuel cell property. Generally, labor costs are included when calculating this credit. Also, no cap exists on the amount of credit available except in the case of fuel cell property.
Not all energy-efficient improvements qualify for these tax credits. For that reason, homeowners should check the manufacturer’s tax credit certification statement before purchasing or installing any of these improvements. The certification statement can usually be found on the manufacturer’s website or with the product packaging. Normally, a homeowner can rely on this certification. The IRS cautions that the manufacturer’s certification is different from the Department of Energy’s Energy Star label, and not all Energy Star labeled products qualify for the tax credits.
Eligible homeowners can claim both of these credits when they file their 2009 federal income tax return. Because these are credits, not deductions, they increase a taxpayer’s refund or reduce the tax he or she owes. An eligible taxpayer can claim these credits, regardless of whether he or she itemizes deductions on Schedule A. Use Form 5695, Residential Energy Credits, to figure and claim these credits. A draft version of this form is available now on IRS.gov.
Friday, October 30, 2009
Happy Halloween From Attorney Taylor
The issue involves whether a chocolate bunny can in fact be trademarked.
Currently, Switzerland’s Lindt & Sprungli are battling chocolate maker Hauswirth of Austria over the gold-wrapped chocolate rabbits, with ribbons around their necks that we all know so well. In 2001, Lindt received a trademark on the three-dimensional shape of its bunny. Following its trademark ruling, Lindt went into full-scale legal attack on many companies which make similar-looking items.
Hauswirth has stayed its ground and questioned the trademark’s validity, arguing that Lindt’s trademark was granted in bad faith (“bad faith” occurs when the applicant knew that identical or similar products already existed in other parts of the European Union, or if the applicant intended to prevent other companies from selling such products).
Historically, three-dimensional trademarks have been surrounded by a slew of controversy. There have been similar problems with chocolate bars, bars of soap, and even Lego toy blocks. And while Americans and Europeans allow logos, graphics, words, and even shapes (in theory), to be trademarked, courts have been hesitant to go down the three-dimensional route. Trademark law does not allow a three-dimensional shape to be registered if the shape is functional. In support of its mark, Lindt says its bunny deserves a chance, and that it is quite complicated to manufacture, citing considerations of structural integrity and high-speed foil wrapping devices.
So, what was the ultimate decision in this delectable chocolate-covered fiasco? Well, that is still being decided by Austria’s high court, which must rule on the bad faith issue, specifically when filing the application for trademark, the relevant factors to consider are:
--the fact that the applicant knows or must know that a third party was using an identical or similar sign for an identical or similar product cable of being confused with the sign for which registration is sought;
--applicant’s intention to prevent that third party from continuing to use such a sign;
--the degree of Legal protection enjoyed by the third party’s sign and by the sign for which registration is sought.
So, before we peel off those foil and plastic wrappers from all those tiny little candies, perhaps we should give a thought to what is inside and how it got there. And perhaps maybe we will get a decision on that very thing just in time for the Easter Bunny.
Kelly L. Swan Taylor, Esq.
Monday, October 19, 2009
Help For Non-Profits From The IRS -- Really.
In addition to the video series,you can read a case study about getting started with the new 990, and there is even a five-part interactive course on how to stay exempt. Of course, the IRS' site for charities is always a great resource.
All of us at Shoffner & Associates are committed to helping each of our not-for-profit clients keep their financial and tax operations functioning smoothly and efficiently so that you can focus on what is really important -- Helping. We are always ready to answer your questions and to lend a hand. Call us. Write to us. Visit our website: shoffnerassociates.com.
Here's what the IRS published just last week:
New Video Series Helps Exempt Organizations Understand Redesigned Form 990 Requirements | |
|
Friday, October 16, 2009
Small Business Retirement Plans... Simplified
New IRS Retirement Plan Navigator Aims to Help Small Businesses | |
|
And, as always, our attorneys are ready and able to help you make the most of every tax advantage. Call us --- anytime.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Non-Compete Agreements Clearly Not Dead In Massachusetts
In the current state of the economy, receiving an employment offer may seem like the best news that could be delivered, especially once you finally receive the offer officially in writing. However, that moment could certainly be diminished by a contract provision, carefully crafted and positioned within the document that could significantly affect your future, even past this current employment. That provision is called a non-compete clause.
A Non-compete clause or covenant not to compete (CNC), is used when one party (usually an employee) agrees not to pursue a similar profession or trade in competition against another party (usually the employer), and usually requiring a reasonable geographic restriction and timeframe. Most states legally allow these contract provisions, including Massachusetts. California is one state that completely prohibits the use of them, except in limited circumstances (for instance, in the sale of the business).
Therefore, largely based upon what some call non-compete “abuse” by employers, Massachusetts’ Representative William H. Brownsberger introduced legislation (H. 1794) that called for the prohibition of non-compete agreements, except in limited circumstances (similar to the California law). Of course, this has lead to many discussions regarding the danger of these agreements and whether they diminish labor mobility or innovation within the market. This is certainly a concern for those professionals who wish to strike out on their own and form start-up companies, only to find out that they are restricted or subject to tremendous litigation fees from their efforts.
Rep. Brownsberger’s bill seemed to be generating enough momentum and support for his bill, that many thought these agreements might finally be dead in Massachusetts. However, this summer, Rep. Brownsberger seems to have backed-down a bit from his strict stance and joined with Rep. Lori Ehrlich to draft a new, compromised bill, that is not as restrictive on these agreements. Surprisingly, the bill introduces many features that some say may make these agreements even MORE prevalent, including the use of presumptive reasonableness within the endorsed parameters. Consequently, if the legislation so clearly and particularly outlines what is considered reasonable, then drafting these provisions will be essentially easy for the employers, and will further promote them (the exact opposite a result that Rep. Brownsberger intends). We will have to wait to see how the legislature ultimately votes on this issue this fall.
So, what is the ultimate lesson to be learned here? First, Non-compete agreements are not things to be ignored, when looking over your contract. You would be advised to have a reputable attorney look over your agreement, to determine if it is reasonable and suits your needs. Second, remember that non-competes are still fully alive in Massachusetts, until further notice, and could significantly affect your employment prospects in the future. And in today’s economy, no one wants to be left out in the cold when it comes to the future of his or her employment.
By Attorney Kelly L. Swan Taylor
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
IRS Update On Record Keeping
What kind of records should I keep? | ||
|
Monday, September 14, 2009
Sell Your Business To An Insider – With Proper Planning You’ll Both Win.
Whether your succession plan includes a sale to a third party, or to an insider, there are significant risks involved. Selling your business to someone on the inside is usually safer than selling to a stranger. And, when you and your skilled advisors execute a carefully designed and implemented sale to an insider you can reduce the risk most significantly.
Let’ look at some steps that you and your professionals can take.
Take Your Time. You and your buyer will need between 3 and 8 years to plan, implement and pay for the transfer of your company. No Kidding. If you don’t have that kind of time – or you don’t want to take that time, work with your advisors to design a different type of exit strategy.
Learn. This is no time to make things up as you go along. Choose professionals – an accountant and a lawyer among others – who know the ins and outs of company transfers. Look for networking groups and seminars that will boost your know-how. Beware of learning just enough to be dangerous. Make the commitment to become an expert.
Build Your Cash Flow. When you transfer your business to an insider, the company’s cash flow will be—at least at the beginning—the only source of the money that you will receive. Really, it is like paying a no-show employee. If you business can’t generate the cash now to pay an absent, highly compensated employee, then you have some serious work to do before you make that transfer.
Maximize Your Value Drivers. Evaluate these 8 key factors because your inside buyer can only succeed if the business’ value keeps growing:
1. Your Customer Base. What is their buying trend? How much of your customer base is junk? What is their buying trend over the last five years? How many new customers have been acquired annually over those same five years? How stable is that customer base? What vulnerabilities exist?
2. Your Recurring Revenue. Your repeating revenue is much more valuable than your one-time sales. Build those repeat sales.
3. Your Product Line. Is it varied? Is it well integrated? Are your products complimentary and competitive?
4. Your Gross Margin. That’s the most important line item on your Profit & Loss.
5. Your Intellectual Property. That includes your patents, trademarks, and copyrights but it also includes things like a unique way to generate sales leads, or an effective way to close Internet sales. What do you know that your competitors don’t? That’s Intellectual Property and it can help your inside buyer be successful.
6. Your History and Your Reputation. This is also known as “good will.” If your company has a great reputation with customers, competitors, and the community, your buyer has a better chance of success and you have a better chance of getting paid.
7. Your Sales and Marketing Effectiveness. Are you using the same old sales strategy that you put in place in 1983? That won’t help your inside buyer. Make sure that your marketing techniques are state-or-the art. Check those close ratios – is your sales force still the super team that it was five years ago? If so, make it better.
8. Your Ability To Fight The Competition. The longer your inside buyer can hold off the competition, the more likely the business is to succeed long after you’ve gone. What are your products true advantages? Do you have a big technical edge? Build your stash of secret weapons.
Make Yourself Expendable. If you’re going to sell to an insider, your buyer should be better at what you do -- than you are. Not only that, but they must be ready, able, and hungry to take on the debt necessary to own the company themselves.
Define Your Goals. Know what your really want, and what you won’t settle without. When your plan is properly designed, your goals will be met before you make the transfer. Write down what you want, and think about these:
· Financial Security
· A set “walk away date”
· Keeping the company legacy
· Rewarding your key people
· Using someone else’s money to bring the company to the next level.
Keep Taxes To A Minimum. You must structure the sale to make sure that the company’s tax in cash flow is kept to a minimum. Otherwise, your buyer is effectively taxed twice. If you do it right, you can save about 1/3 of the company’s cash flow, which increases your chances of getting paid.
Transfer Ownership One Step At A Time. Make sure that you stay in – or near—the driver’s seat until you’ve received the entire sales price. Maintain voting and operational control and shift the risk the new owners. That way, if performance falters, or the new owners decide to throw in the towel, your company will survive.
Write It Down. Once you’ve thought through your plan, you need to write it clearly and communicate it to your eventual owners. Otherwise, nobody will take it seriously. Also, and more importantly, the written plan is what you and your professional advisors will use to coordinate what you do to make your plan a reality. When you include a time line in your plan, you are even more likely to see it succeed.
Don’t Forget To Dream. Every once in a while, sit back and imagine how wonderful it will be when you successfully transferred the business that you started to the next generation. What a success!